PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MMM vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MMM vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 3M Company (MMM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
30.23%
12.53%
MMM
^GSPC

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MMM achieves a 45.37% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 25.15% return. Over the past 10 years, MMM has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 3.14%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 11.21% annualized return.


MMM

YTD

45.37%

1M

0.93%

6M

30.23%

1Y

66.63%

5Y (annualized)

2.33%

10Y (annualized)

3.14%

^GSPC

YTD

25.15%

1M

2.97%

6M

12.53%

1Y

31.00%

5Y (annualized)

13.95%

10Y (annualized)

11.21%

Key characteristics


MMM^GSPC
Sharpe Ratio1.982.53
Sortino Ratio3.393.39
Omega Ratio1.481.47
Calmar Ratio1.213.65
Martin Ratio10.7816.21
Ulcer Index6.18%1.91%
Daily Std Dev33.73%12.23%
Max Drawdown-59.10%-56.78%
Current Drawdown-22.87%-0.53%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.6

The correlation between MMM and ^GSPC is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MMM vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 3M Company (MMM) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MMM, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.982.53
The chart of Sortino ratio for MMM, currently valued at 3.39, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.003.393.39
The chart of Omega ratio for MMM, currently valued at 1.48, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.481.47
The chart of Calmar ratio for MMM, currently valued at 1.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.213.65
The chart of Martin ratio for MMM, currently valued at 10.78, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0010.7816.21
MMM
^GSPC

The current MMM Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MMM and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.98
2.53
MMM
^GSPC

Drawdowns

MMM vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MMM drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, roughly equal to the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MMM and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.87%
-0.53%
MMM
^GSPC

Volatility

MMM vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

3M Company (MMM) has a higher volatility of 8.64% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 3.97%. This indicates that MMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
8.64%
3.97%
MMM
^GSPC